Web development forUK companies
Next.js builds that load fast, meet WCAG 2.2 AA, and handle consent the way the ICO expects — not a theme with a plugin stack holding it together.
Web Development in United Kingdom
Web development for a UK company is more than a fast build. The site has to handle consent under PECR and UK GDPR, where refusing non-essential cookies is as easy as accepting them; it has to meet WCAG 2.2 AA to hold up under the Equality Act and public sector procurement; and it has to survive a replatform without losing the search rankings you already have. Blackbyrds Digital builds those sites in Next.js and React, quoted as a fixed price in GBP.
Why here
Why this works for United Kingdom.
Most UK web projects that need a studio are replatforms, not first sites. There is a WordPress install with a decade of plugins, a page builder nobody wants to touch, and a Core Web Vitals score the marketing team gets asked about every quarter. Moving to Next.js fixes the performance story properly — server-rendered pages, a real image and font strategy, no caching plugin propping it up — but the part that decides whether the project succeeds is the redirect map. We audit the existing URL set, map every old path to a new one, and carry the metadata and structured data across so the traffic you already earned survives the move.
The UK-specific work sits in two places most quotes ignore. The first is consent: under PECR, non-essential cookies need consent before they fire, and ICO guidance is clear that rejecting must be as easy as accepting — which means analytics, ad pixels, and third-party embeds have to be wired behind a consent state rather than dropped into the head and hoped for. The second is accessibility: WCAG 2.2 AA is the practical standard, it is a live consideration under the Equality Act for private organisations, and it is a hard requirement for public sector bodies under the 2018 accessibility regulations and increasingly a condition of selling to them. Both are far less expensive to build in than to retrofit after somebody audits you.
What you get
How the work runs.
Consent that holds up without wrecking your measurement
Analytics, pixels, and embeds load from a consent state rather than on page load, with the reject path as prominent as the accept path. We will also tell you the uncomfortable part up front: once consent is implemented properly, your analytics numbers change. Better to know why in week one than to spend a quarter arguing with the dashboard.
WCAG 2.2 AA built in, not retrofitted
Semantic markup, visible focus states, real contrast ratios, keyboard paths through every interaction, and forms with labels a screen reader can use. Building to that standard costs a fraction of what it costs to unpick a component library after an accessibility audit — and it is the difference between passing a public sector tender and being screened out of it.
A replatform that keeps your rankings
We inventory the existing URLs, map redirects one by one rather than with a catch-all rule, and match metadata, canonical tags, and JSON-LD before launch. Sitemap and robots go out with the release, and we watch coverage and crawl behaviour afterwards instead of declaring victory at go-live.
Web FAQ
Common questions.
Can the site run on UK or EU infrastructure?
Yes. Vercel is our default for Next.js because framework features land there first, and its functions can be pinned to the London region; where a client’s policy requires something else we deploy to AWS eu-west-2 or another provider procurement has already approved. Where the application runs, where the database sits, and where backups live are decisions we write down at the start rather than discover during a security review.
We are on WordPress. Do we have to leave it?
Not necessarily. If the content model is sound and the real problem is a theme plus fifteen plugins, the honest answer is sometimes to fix what is there, or to run WordPress headless behind a Next.js front end so your editors keep the interface they know. We would rather say that in a scoping call than sell you a rebuild you did not need.
Do you design as well, or work from ours?
Either. Companies with an in-house designer or an agency partner usually hand us Figma and keep design where it is; we build a documented component library from it that your team can extend. If you need design too, we run UX/UI in the same studio and price it as a separate line so you can take it or leave it.