Solutions / Dedicated Teams

Extend your engineering teamwithout hiring locally.

Engineers who work only on your roadmap — in your repository, your board, and your standup. You direct the work; we handle the hiring, the ramp-up, and the continuity behind it.

In short

What a dedicated development team actually is.

A dedicated development team from Blackbyrds Digital is a group of engineers who work only on your product roadmap — inside your repository, your issue tracker, and your rituals — for as long as the roadmap needs them. It is not a staffing agency putting CVs on your desk and stepping away: we scope the roles against your roadmap before proposing anyone, onboard the engineers ourselves, and stay accountable for how the work is done rather than for the hours billed. It is also not a fixed-scope project: there is no statement of work to close out, no launch date to hand over on, and no change request when your priorities move in the second month. You set the direction the way you set it for your own team, and we carry the recruitment, the ramp-up, and the continuity behind it.

Honest fit

When this makes sense — and when it does not.

A dedicated team is the right shape for some problems and the wrong shape for others. Working that out now is far less painful than discovering it three weeks into an engagement, so here is the plain version.

A dedicated team fits when

  • The roadmap has no natural end date

    You are running a product, not a project. There is always a next quarter, the backlog outgrows the team every time you look at it, and the thing you actually need is sustained capacity rather than one more delivery.

  • Your in-house team needs depth, not just headcount

    You have engineers, and they are good, but there is a layer they cannot get to — the mobile build, the API work, the test coverage nobody has time for. Adding people who plug into that layer moves the roadmap faster than another generalist would.

  • A v1 is live and now has to be maintained and extended

    The founding build shipped and the product has real users. What follows — reliability work, the features those users are asking for, the refactors deferred to get to launch — is continuous engineering, and it does not fit into a fixed scope.

  • Hiring in your own market has stalled

    The role is approved and it has been open for months. Rather than keep waiting, you can bring in senior engineers now and carry on hiring locally in parallel — the two are not mutually exclusive, and we have no interest in standing in the way of your in-house hire.

Something else fits better when

  • You have a well-defined one-off build

    If the thing you need is specified, has an end state, and you would rather have a fixed quote than an ongoing team, take a fixed-scope project instead. It is less to manage on your side, and you will pay for a defined outcome rather than continuous capacity.

    Custom software projects
  • You are an agency who wants to sell this under your own brand

    Team extension assumes you are the end client. If you are an agency delivering to your own clients and need engineering that stays invisible behind your brand, that is a different arrangement with different rules about who talks to whom.

    White-label development
  • You need one answer, not ongoing capacity

    An architecture review, a code audit, a build-versus-buy decision, or a modernisation plan is a question with a written answer. Standing up a team to reach it is the expensive way round.

    Technical consulting
  • Nobody on your side owns the priorities

    A dedicated team is directed by you, which means someone has to decide what matters this sprint and answer questions when they come up. Without that person, the engineers will make product decisions by default — and you will not like all of them. A specified project is safer.

How it works · 04 steps

From roadmap to working team.

STEP 1
1

Scope the roles against the roadmap

We read your roadmap and backlog rather than a job specification, then come back with which roles the work actually justifies, at what seniority, in what order, and what each one would own in its first quarter. If the roadmap only supports one engineer, we say one engineer.

STEP 2
2

Match the engineers

We propose specific people against that scope — what they have built, and why they suit this codebase. You interview them and you can say no. Availability is confirmed at this stage, never promised in advance: if a role cannot be filled on the timeline you need, you hear that before you plan around it.

STEP 3
3

Onboard into your tools and rituals

Accounts in your repository, your board, and your chat, on your access rules. The first fortnight is deliberately small, reviewable changes so your reviewers can calibrate and the engineers can learn the codebase in public. Onboarding notes are written as they go and stay with you.

STEP 4
4

Review the engagement and adjust it

A written note every week and a scheduled review every quarter, where roles get added, changed, wound down, or ended. Changing the shape of the team is a planned conversation with a notice period, not a renegotiation you have to brace for.

Roles we staff

The seats we can genuinely fill.

This is the list of roles we staff — not a catalogue of everything the market sells. If what you need is not here, we will tell you rather than stretch someone into it.

Front-end engineer

React · Next.js · TypeScript

Owns the interface layer: component architecture, the design-system code your designers hand off into, state and data-fetching boundaries, accessibility, and the Core Web Vitals work that keeps pages fast as the app grows.

Full-stack engineer

Next.js · Node · Postgres

Takes a roadmap item from schema to screen — data model, API, interface, and the tests around them. The right first hire when a feature keeps stalling at the handover point between two specialists.

Back-end and API engineer

Node · REST & GraphQL · Postgres · Supabase

Data models, APIs, authentication and permissions, third-party integrations, background jobs, and the queries that quietly get slower as your tables fill up. Owns the half of the product your users never see and always feel.

Mobile engineer

React Native · iOS · Android

Cross-platform iOS and Android from one codebase, including the parts teams underestimate: release pipeline, store submissions, device testing, push notifications, and native modules where the shared layer runs out.

QA engineer

Test plans · Regression · Release checks

Turns acceptance criteria into test plans, builds and maintains the regression pass, writes bug reports another engineer can reproduce without a call, and runs the pre-release check so launches stop being an event.

Technical lead

Architecture · Code review · Delivery

Breaks roadmap items into work, holds the architecture and review standard, and is the person your team escalates to. Worth adding when the engineering questions have started landing on someone whose job is not engineering.

Product designer

Figma · UX flows · Design systems

Flows, wireframes, and interface design, plus the design system the engineers build against. Our UX/UI practice is an established part of the studio, so this role sits alongside the engineering seats rather than being subcontracted out.

Availability for any given role is confirmed during scoping. We do not hold seats open against a web page, and we will not tell you a role is filled until the person is named and you have met them.

Ways of working

How we work inside your team.

Tooling

Your repository, your board

We work in your GitHub or GitLab organisation and your issue tracker, on your branch naming, commit conventions, and pull-request template. No parallel tracker, no weekly export from a system you cannot see into, no status that only exists in our tools.

Cadence

Your standup, your sprint rhythm

Engineers attend your ceremonies as members of your team — standup, planning, retro, whatever you actually run. If you do not work in sprints, we do not impose them; the point is to fit your rhythm, not to install ours on top of it.

Quality

Code review against your standards

Every change goes through your review process and your reviewers have the final say. Our engineers also review each other and work to our own standards on testing, structure, and documentation — but where the two disagree, your conventions win, because your team maintains this after we are gone.

Overlap

A named overlap window, not a vague promise

Our engineers work Philippine Standard Time (UTC+8) from Silang, Cavite. Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Perth share our clock outright. Eastern Australia sits two to three hours ahead, leaving five or six hours of a normal day in common. The UK and continental Europe are six to eight hours behind, so our late afternoon meets your morning — two hours by default, three or four when the team starts later. North America is the honest exception: at twelve to sixteen hours behind there is no natural overlap, so we agree a shifted window in writing before the engagement starts instead of discovering the problem in week two.

Reporting

A written weekly note

Every week you get a short written summary: what shipped, what is in progress, what is blocked and on whom, and anything we think you should know before it becomes a decision. It is written to be read by someone who missed every standup — a founder, a board member, a stakeholder in another department.

Your control

What stays yours.

Team extension only works if the things that make it your product stay on your side of the line. These are not concessions we negotiate — they are how the arrangement is built.

The customer relationship

We do not contact your customers, appear in your product, or sit on a call with your users unless you put us there deliberately. The people who buy from you keep dealing with you.

The roadmap and the priorities

What gets built, in what order, and what gets cut are your calls. We will argue a technical case when we think a sequence is wrong, and then we will build what you decided.

The architecture decisions you want to own

Where you already have a pattern, we follow it. Where you want the decision, you get a written recommendation with the trade-offs laid out and you choose — no framework arrives in your codebase because an engineer preferred it.

The code, as it is written

Work lands in your repository continuously, with real commit history and documentation written as the work happens. Nothing accumulates on a machine in Silang waiting for a delivery date, so there is never a moment where your product is somewhere you cannot see it.

Related

Products we have built and kept building.

Dedicated team FAQ

Questions people ask before committing.

Whatever is not answered here, ask us directly — we reply within one business day, and we would rather talk you out of a bad fit than into one.

How is this different from hiring a freelancer?

A freelancer is one person and one relationship: when they are unavailable, ill, or move on to a better offer, the work stops and the context leaves with them. A dedicated team is scoped and staffed by us, works under our technical review as well as yours, and writes onboarding notes from day one so the knowledge lives in your repository rather than in one head. The honest trade-off is that a freelancer is simpler and lighter for a small, self-contained piece of work — if that is what you have, hire one.

How is it different from a staffing agency?

A staffing agency sells you the CV. They source, place, invoice the hours, and from the day the contract starts the performance question is entirely yours. We scope the roles against your roadmap before proposing anyone, onboard the engineers ourselves, hold them to our engineering standards alongside your own, and treat the output as our responsibility rather than the timesheet. When something is not working, that is our problem to fix, not a re-recruitment exercise you have to run again.

What is the minimum engagement?

We usually ask for an initial three months, because that is roughly how long it takes for a good engineer to become genuinely productive in an unfamiliar codebase — anything shorter mostly buys you the ramp-up. After that it runs month to month with no retainer lock-in and no annual commitment. Ending it is a notice-period conversation so we can hand over cleanly, not a penalty clause, and the exact terms are written into the engagement before anything starts.

Can we scale the team up or down?

Yes, and it is meant to be a scheduled conversation rather than an awkward one. Adding a role runs through the same scoping and matching steps as the first hire, so plan for lead time — new engineers are not instant, and anyone who tells you otherwise is describing a bench, not a match. Scaling down works on the notice period agreed at the start, which gives us time to write up and hand over whatever is in flight instead of dropping it mid-sprint.

What time zone do your engineers work in?

Philippine Standard Time, UTC+8, from Silang in Cavite. Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, and Perth share our clock outright; eastern Australia is two to three hours ahead, so five or six hours of a standard day overlap. The UK and continental Europe are six to eight hours behind us, which puts our late afternoon against your morning — two hours by default, three or four when the team starts later. North America is the hard case: the east coast is twelve to thirteen hours behind and the west coast fifteen to sixteen, so an early Philippine start catches the tail of the Pacific afternoon and anything beyond that needs a deliberately shifted schedule, which we agree in writing during scoping.

Do they work only on our project?

Yes — that is the whole point of the arrangement. An engineer assigned to your team is not shared across other clients, not rotated onto an unrelated launch when it gets busy, and not quietly split between two backlogs. They keep internal commitments to the studio itself, such as code review and technical discussion, because that is what keeps their work sharp. If we ever needed to move someone, you would hear it from us in advance with a plan attached, not afterwards.

How do you handle onboarding and handover if we end the engagement?

Because the work lands in your repository as it is written, there is no final delivery event to wait for — you already hold the code, the commit history, and the environment configuration on the day you give notice. During the notice period we put the remaining knowledge in writing: architecture notes, deployment and environment setup, known issues and the workarounds in place, and anything that only exists as habit. We then run walkthroughs with whoever is picking the work up. Commercial terms for the engagement are agreed in writing per engagement rather than assumed from a web page.

What happens if an engineer is not the right fit?

Tell us early and directly. We would far rather replace someone in week three than have your team quietly work around them for a quarter, and we do not charge you for the replacement process or turn it into an argument about who was right. Because onboarding notes are written from the start and everything is already in your repository, a replacement picks up context considerably faster than the original ramp-up took.

Ready to start

Need engineers on your roadmap?

Send us the roadmap or the backlog. We reply within one business day with an honest read on the roles it justifies — including the case for not doing this at all.

No retainer lock-in · Written scope before anything starts