Case study · 2024

Greystone Capital  AI Leverage Audit

A boutique investment advisory firm asked for an honest, no-vendor-interest read on where AI belongs in compliance work — and where it absolutely does not.

Financial ServicesDigital StrategyAI & Agents

Impact

What changed.

01

Three priorities, scoped to budget

The three highest-leverage workflows were scoped against real engagement budgets the directors could take straight to the board — no vague estimates, no "starts at" pricing.

02

One explicit no-go

The KYC pre-screen was flagged red and explicitly recommended against automating without human-in-the-loop. The written regulatory reasoning likely saved the firm a costly compliance incident — and a six-figure vendor commitment.

03

Roadmap → internal build

The client used our roadmap as the implementation brief and built Phase 1 (document classification) internally with their existing engineering team. We were happy to lose the build — the audit did its job.

Financial advisor reviewing portfolio documents at a desk

The challenge

Before

Greystone Capital is a boutique investment advisory firm with around 40 employees. Their compliance team was drowning in document routing and quarterly client reporting — the kind of repetitive judgement work that looks like a perfect AI use case until you read the regulatory rules. Leadership had been approached by half a dozen "AI for finance" SaaS vendors, each with a confident pitch and zero appreciation for the risk surface. The directors wanted a written, vendor-neutral read on where AI belonged in the operation — and, just as importantly, where it didn't.

  • Compliance lead manually routing client documents across 4 reviewer queues
  • Quarterly client reports drafted from scratch each cycle by ops team
  • KYC pre-screen handled manually with no documented decision criteria
  • Six "AI for finance" vendor pitches active simultaneously with no evaluation framework
  • Leadership unsure which workflows carried regulatory risk if automated
  • No internal benchmarks for hours-saved-per-workflow
  • Previous SaaS trial abandoned mid-pilot because nobody had scoped the use case
  • No written roadmap to take to the board for AI investment approval

The solution

What we built

We ran our 1-week paid AI Operations Audit. We interviewed the compliance lead, the ops director, and the head of client services. We walked the document-routing pipeline end-to-end, sat through a quarterly reporting cycle, and mapped the KYC pre-screen in detail. We scored 18 workflows on hours saved, automation complexity, and regulatory risk. The deliverable was a written report identifying three priority candidates: document classification (high leverage, low risk — green light), quarterly report drafting (medium leverage, medium risk, human-in-the-loop required), and a third candidate flagged in red — KYC pre-screen. We explicitly recommended against automating KYC without a human reviewer on every decision, with the regulatory reasoning written out. The client built doc classification internally using our roadmap as the brief.

Greystone Capital — AI Leverage Audit solution

Core workflow connections

How the system flows.

  • Discovery interviewscompliance lead, ops director, head of client services
  • Workflow mapping18 ops and compliance workflows scoped end-to-end
  • Risk scoringregulatory exposure weighted alongside hours saved
  • Document routing analysis4 reviewer queues mapped with decision criteria
  • Quarterly reporting cycle walkthroughbottleneck identified at draft stage
  • KYC pre-screen reviewflagged red, explicit no-go with regulatory reasoning
  • Priced roadmaptop 3 workflows scoped against real engagement budgets
  • Written reportPDF + Notion, formatted for board-level review

Process

How we built it.

Step 01

Discovery interviews → compliance lead, ops director, head of client services

Step 02

Workflow mapping → 18 ops and compliance workflows scoped end-to-end

Step 03

Risk scoring → regulatory exposure weighted alongside hours saved

Step 04

Document routing analysis → 4 reviewer queues mapped with decision criteria

Step 05

Quarterly reporting cycle walkthrough → bottleneck identified at draft stage

Step 06

KYC pre-screen review → flagged red, explicit no-go with regulatory reasoning

Step 07

Priced roadmap → top 3 workflows scoped against real engagement budgets

Step 08

Written report → PDF + Notion, formatted for board-level review

Start a project

Need an honest read on AI risk in a regulated business?

Our 1-week AI Operations Audit is vendor-neutral on purpose. We'll tell you which workflows AI should touch, and which ones it absolutely should not — in writing.

No retainer lock-in · Month-to-month · Full transparency

Start a project