Schematic of an AI assistant: message thread with tool calls running underneath

Solera Energy AI Procurement Agent

A Brisbane solar EPC contractor let an AI agent draft, compare, and route AUD 4M of monthly supplier RFQs.

At a glance · Engineering & Construction · 2026

What Blackbyrds Digital built, and what changed

Blackbyrds Digital deployed a procurement agent that reads incoming RFQs, drafts supplier comparisons, and routes purchase recommendations for a fast-growing solar EPC. Headline result: 8.4 to 2.1 days (RFQ-to-PO cycle).

Published

Solera Energy AI Procurement AgentOne system
  • RFQ Intake
  • Requirement Parsing
  • Supplier Panel Match
  • RFQ Drafted
Shared data · role-based access4 of the modules shown
Schematic of the shipped system, drawn from the case notes

The challenge

Before

Solera Energy is a Brisbane-headquartered solar EPC contractor putting roughly AUD 4M a month through procurement across modules, inverters, mounting, cable, and balance-of-system. The procurement team of four was drowning — RFQs arriving as PDFs, quotes returning in inconsistent formats, comparisons hand-built in Excel, and recommendations written in long email threads that the project managers admitted they often skimmed. The team was missing better-priced alternatives simply because the analysis was too tedious to do thoroughly.

  • Inbound RFQs arriving as inconsistent PDFs from project engineers
  • Supplier quotes returning in mismatched formats and line-item naming
  • Bid comparisons hand-built in Excel taking 4-6 hours per package
  • Procurement recommendations sent as long email threads, often skimmed
  • No memory of past supplier performance influencing new decisions
  • Better-priced alternatives missed because thorough analysis was slow
  • Compliance documents (certificates, warranties) re-collected per quote
  • No audit trail tying final PO back to the comparison that justified it
BeforeDisconnected tools
  • Inbound RFQs arriving as inconsistent PDFs…
  • Supplier quotes returning in mismatched…
  • Bid comparisons hand-built in Excel taking…
  • Procurement recommendations sent as long…
  • No memory of past supplier performance…
  • Better-priced alternatives missed because…
Schematic of the starting point, drawn from the case notes

The solution

What we built

We built a procurement agent that handles the work the team had been doing manually. When a project engineer raises an RFQ, the agent parses the requirement, identifies eligible suppliers from a vetted panel, drafts the outgoing RFQ in the firm's template, and sends it. When quotes return — in whatever format — the agent extracts line items, normalizes units of measure, applies known supplier discount structures, and produces a side-by-side comparison with total landed cost including freight, duties, and lead-time penalties. The agent flags compliance gaps (missing certificates, expired warranties) and pulls in supplier performance history (on-time delivery, reject rates, payment terms compliance) from the firm's history. A recommendation is generated with the agent's reasoning, but a human procurement lead approves before any PO is issued. Approval is one click; every decision and its justification is preserved as an audit trail. The agent runs on a private deployment with the firm's data — supplier price files never leave the environment.

How the system flows

  1. RFQ IntakeRequirement ParsingSupplier Panel MatchRFQ Drafted
  2. Quote Received (PDF/email/XLS)Line ExtractionUnit Normalisation
  3. Comparison BuildLanded CostCompliance CheckPerformance History
  4. Recommendation DraftedReasoning CapturedProcurement Lead Review
  5. ApprovalPO GeneratedAudit Trail LinkedProject Cost Updated
  6. Supplier Performance FeedbackDelivery + Reject CaptureHistory Update
  7. Compliance Document RefreshCertificate Expiry WatchSupplier Nudge
  • Private deployment with supplier price files inside the firm environment
  • One-click human approval preserving every reasoning step
  • Vetted supplier panel maintained by procurement, not by the agent
Schematic of an AI assistant: message thread with tool calls running underneath
Schematic of an AI assistant: message thread with tool calls running underneath

Drowning in supplier quotes and PDF comparisons?

We build procurement agents that respect human approval — they do the grinding analysis, you keep the decision and the audit trail.

No retainer lock-in · Month-to-month · Full transparency