Case study · 2025

Meridian Foundation Grants Management Platform

A New York foundation running 40+ grant cycles a year moved from email and Excel to one auditable platform.

NGO / Public SectorCustom SoftwareDigital Strategy

Impact

What changed.

01

Portfolio visibility

Board portfolio reporting moved from a six-week year-end scramble to a live dashboard available any day of the year.

02

Condition discipline

Of 312 active grant conditions, the foundation now tracks 100% to documented evidence — up from an estimated 60% before the platform.

03

Applicant experience

Applicant satisfaction scores rose from 3.1 to 4.6 out of 5. The foundation now hears from organizations that had previously found their application process opaque.

Foundation program officers reviewing grant proposals in meeting room

The challenge

Before

Meridian Foundation deploys roughly $24M a year across forty grant cycles supporting youth and education programs across the United States. Applications came in by email PDF, were logged in Excel, scored on a shared Google Sheet, voted on at committee, and then disbursed through a finance system that had no link to any of the above. Reporting back to the board on portfolio outcomes required a six-week scramble at year-end, and the program officers admitted they often could not remember which conditions they had attached to which grant.

  • Grant applications received as email PDFs, logged into Excel by hand
  • Scoring done on a shared Google Sheet with manual rubric application
  • Committee voting recorded in meeting minutes, not in any system
  • Disbursement happening in finance with no link back to application
  • Grant conditions tracked in a Word document per grant, often forgotten
  • Grantee reports emailed as attachments, filed in inconsistent folders
  • Year-end portfolio report taking six weeks of analyst scramble
  • No way to surface which programs were producing measurable outcomes

The solution

What we built

We built a grants management platform that owns the full lifecycle from applicant intake to portfolio reporting. Applicants apply through a branded portal with field-level rubric mapping, document upload, and budget structuring. Internal review routes the application to assigned program officers with structured scoring against the cycle's criteria. Committee deliberation is supported by a meeting-mode interface that captures votes, conditions, and notes in real time. Approved grants flow into a conditions tracker — every condition has an owner, a due date, and an evidence requirement. Disbursement is initiated from the platform and reconciled back to finance through an integration with the foundation's general ledger. Grantee reports come in through the same portal, mapped to the original logic model, and roll up to portfolio dashboards that show outcome metrics by program area. The board now sees a live portfolio dashboard instead of waiting for a year-end PDF.

Meridian Foundation Grants Management Platform solution

Core workflow connections

How the system flows.

  • Application SubmittedEligibility CheckProgram Officer Assignment
  • Rubric ScoringCommittee BundleMeeting ModeVote Captured
  • ApprovalConditions TrackerOwner + Due Date + Evidence Required
  • Disbursement TriggerFinance IntegrationPayment ConfirmedAudit Log
  • Grantee ReportLogic Model MappingOutcome Metric Aggregation
  • Portfolio DashboardProgram Area Roll-upBoard Briefing
  • Renewal ApplicationPrior Cycle ContextPrefilled Workflow
  • Conflict-of-Interest declarations captured per scorer per cycle
  • Document retention scheduled per IRS and state attorney general rules
  • Branded applicant portal with field-level rubric mapping

Process

How we built it.

Step 01

Application Submitted → Eligibility Check → Program Officer Assignment

Step 02

Rubric Scoring → Committee Bundle → Meeting Mode → Vote Captured

Step 03

Approval → Conditions Tracker → Owner + Due Date + Evidence Required

Step 04

Disbursement Trigger → Finance Integration → Payment Confirmed → Audit Log

Step 05

Grantee Report → Logic Model Mapping → Outcome Metric Aggregation

Step 06

Portfolio Dashboard → Program Area Roll-up → Board Briefing

Step 07

Renewal Application → Prior Cycle Context → Prefilled Workflow

Step 08

Conflict-of-Interest declarations captured per scorer per cycle

Step 09

Document retention scheduled per IRS and state attorney general rules

Step 10

Branded applicant portal with field-level rubric mapping

Start a project

Running grants on email and Excel?

We build grants management platforms that respect both donor accountability and applicant dignity — not a recycled CRM with a grants skin.

No retainer lock-in · Month-to-month · Full transparency

Start a project